Plato and Aristotle: An Analysis Essay

Determining the outgo normal of govern mental association was important to the quaint Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and any(prenominal) of them expressed his stamp in important works much(prenominal) as the country and Politics. In explaining, canvass, and separate the policy-making philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, it is evident that apiece of them dual-lane the same goal of identifying and promoting the shell wee of semi governmental government. They withal sh bed in mutual the same philosophy regarding the origins of a policy-making state. The State arises, Plato says finished Socrates in the Republic, out of the needs of mankind. (Plato) Aristotle agrees, and declares that the state is a semi governmental partnership that exists for purposes of self-sufficiency as well as for the sake of hold well. In other words, the State exists in order to provide for the well-being of its citizens. Aristotle expresses this in Politics when he argues, the go od animation is the purpose of the city-state. (Aristotle) Further more than, two Aristotle and Plato agreed that human is by nature a political animal, because he has the ability to express his thoughts about(predicate) justice.Their respective analyses reflected their respect for justice, and their elevation of it to the highest priority. In the Republic, Plato defines just political prescript as a system in which each interest is satisfied to the proper ut more or less and every atomic number 53 has what is theirs. The philosophers see the knowledge they want the warriors have the honors they want and the commoners have the goods and pleasures they want, under the initiate guidance of philosophers and warriors. The methods of Aristotle and Plato were homogeneous in legion(predicate) ways.They both(prenominal) utilized logic, evaluations of contemporary politics, and extensive comparisons of various types of political find to fix at their conclusions. As citizens o f ancient Greece, they both shared much the same panorama on society, religion, morality, and politics. They also shared similar historical perspectives, and their perceptions of contemporary events were springed through the same philosophical context. champion of the contrasts among their methods is that Plato used analogies to make his points.He examined a political state by comparing the state with the human soul. Unlike Aristotle, he also used a stylus of approach in which he make his points through dialogues involving Socrates. He also knowing an precedent state run by people he referred to as The Guardians which differed from Aristotles approach in Politics, in which carriage and form more closely resembled an strain or monologue. In Politics, Aristotle emphasized that fabricate political determine involves pursuing policies which are to the common advantage of the most people.Aristotle conclude that rulers who placed their own interests above everyone elses had no political legitimacy, for their tyranny brought distraint upon their own people. Aristotle set forth the best forms of political rule as kingship, aristocracy and polity, and described the worst forms as tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. Plato was also harshly critical of tyranny, and described it in the Republic as, non a matter of humble theft and violence, but of wholesale plunder, sacral and profane, private or public. (Plato) Both mens methods involved a statewide analytic thinking of the consequences of each form of rule.Aristotle criticized country because its consequences were rule by the multitude, which causes injustice. He criticized Oligarchy because its consequences were rule by the wealthy, which also causes injustice and he criticized Tyranny because its consequences were dictatorship, which again causes injustice. In scathe of the merits of the citizenry, Aristotle notes that the people may collectively be the best judges of certain things, so it is justi fied for them to take part in deliberations. But like Plato, he feels that the common people are not suitable to share in the highest offices.Both Plato and Aristotle also agree that laws need to be make in accordance with the regime, and agree that the more just a ruler is, the more just the laws will be. Essentially, both Aristotle and Plato insist that the goal of politics should be justice. One difference between them is that Plato believed that the best adduce to rule was education and justice, although he conceded that at that place is also a claim to rule based on wealth and on numbers. Another difference is that Aristotle emphasized that the most important task for a drawing card was to be a lawgiver, and to frame the admit report for the city-state.In Aristotles system, it was the draws duty to provide permanent laws, customs, and institutions for the citizens. According to Aristotle, once the constitution was in place, the ruler needed to take the demand steps to maintain it, to implement reforms when he considered them necessary, and to guard against any subversion of the political system. Aristotles emphasis on a constitution sets him apart from Plato, who considered philosopher kingship the best form of political rule. Aristotle described a constitution as a certain purchase order of the inhabitants of the city-state, and as the way of biography of the citizens.(Aristotle) He also speaks of the constitution of a club as the form of the compound and argues that whether the companionship is the same over time depends on whether it has the same constitution. (Aristotle) It should be noted that notwithstanding the fact that Aristotles political views were influenced by Plato, he was very critical of the ideal city-state set forth in Platos Republic. He based his criticism on the grounds that Platos ideal city-state overvalued political unity, embraced a system of communism that was meshuga and inimical to human nature, and neglected the bliss of the individual citizens.In contrast, in Aristotles view of the ideal State each and every citizen would possess moral virtue and the equipment to carry it out in practice, and thereby attain a life of morality and complete happiness. All of the citizens would hold political office and possess private prop because one should call the city-state happy not by looking at a part of it but at all the citizens. (Aristotle) In conclusion, the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle were both concerned with identifying and promoting the best form of political association.In works such as the Republic and Politics, they used similar methods of analysis to evaluate the best form of political rule. For Aristotle, the best form of political rule corresponded to the best way of life for a human being. Since the best way of life is living nobly and according to virtue, the best political form of rule is the one which promotes this kind of life. For Plato, the best form of poli tical rule was Aristocracy, for it involves rule by the best people in the political community. Bibliography Aristotle. Politics. impertinently York Dover Publications, 2000. Plato. Republic. New York Viking Press, 1955.